Freedom to Choose
Sometimes the answers to improving business performance aren't found in the boardroom, but from the company frontline. John Smythe from Engage for Change tells CEO how including employees in company decisions can boost productivity.Date: 19 Dec 2007
|
When I interviewed Allan Leighton, chairman of Britain's Royal Mail, as research for my book on employee engagement, he described how following the postal service’s controversial step of scrapping the second post, it turned to its staff to work out the implementation. "Sharing power as a leader means admitting that you don’t know all the answers."
In other words, he went to the people who had to make it work, extolling his personal philosophy of how "in organisational change it’s the what down and the how up". Most employees hear about new strategies, change, post-merger integration or everyday decisions only after management have made their decisions, which are then communicated through the usual array of top-down communication channels. People on the receiving end often feel powerless and sometimes scared. Rarely does this style of decision making engage them - when was the last time a 'cascade briefing' caused excitement? Yet leaders, whether bosses or supervisors, hang on to hierarchy and power because they think that being the boss means being right and making all the decisions. CREATING ENGAGEMENT Increasingly, organisations are engaging their employees in everyday decision making in a charge to drive performance. But there is also much hype around the idea of employee engagement. Walk into many companies and you will be presented with a long list of factors which claim to cause engagement. Many are just re-packaged employee satisfaction surveys with an added action process, designed in the hope that employee engagement will increase. During my research I became a temporary organisational fellow with management consulting firm McKinsey and Company, looking into the meaning and value of employee engagement (among 59 organisations worldwide). We charged ourselves with deciding what was the single most influential cause or driver of engagement. SHARING POWER We concluded that the primary driver to engage senior staff and employees is the appetite and ability of leaders to engage their subordinates in everyday decision making. In other words, to share their power and reach down to those who deliver the service on the frontline. "The old exchange of security for loyalty between employer and employee is dead."
Sharing power as a leader means admitting that you don’t know all the answers and being able to move forward. For Jon Hargreaves, MD of Scottish Water, employee engagement is a leadership philosophy first and a set of tools and skills second. It can be argued that we have been here before with empowerment in the 1990s. What is different this time around is the old exchange of security for loyalty between employer and employee is dead. Instead, the best and brightest, and everyone else for that matter, will move on until they find a culture where their creativity and challenge is welcome. THE BENEFITS OF EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT Leaders who engage the right groups will benefit both in terms of quality decisions and speed of execution. The engaging leader is not handing over power to the people in a Marxist fashion, he or she must set direction and govern dialogue in a convincing way, always knowing when to close down the engagement. In conclusion, I would make these points about employee engagement:
CEO has negotiated a special price for its readers: quote G07EX/25% when ordering via www.gowerpub.com and you will receive THE CEO by John Smythe (978-0-566-08561-1) for £18.75 instead of the usual £25.00. |
